Astroturf
explorelearn moreadvanced
Telecom & Net Neutrality->FCC->Restoring Internet Freedom (17-108)

Cluster e4b39c738b90... / semantic

Cluster of 11 comments

Representative

Nima Daivari / Apr 28, 2017

Date range

Apr 28, 2017

Embedding model

databricks-bge-large-en

Similarity threshold

0.92

Investigative Campaign Dossier

Cluster Size11Filings grouped
Confidence Score85.0%Coordination proof
Exact-Match Ratio100.0%Copy-paste
Near-Duplicate Ratio0.0%Paraphrased
Cluster Purity100.0%Boilerplate saturation
Mean Similarity0.9200Cosine proximity

Campaign Execution & Evolution Narrative

This cluster represents a simple copy-paste campaign. Filings are character-for-character identical, showing zero attempt to hide behind paraphrasing or synonym mutations. It was submitted at exactly 19:00 UTC, demonstrating a simple bulk automated API import routine.

EVIDENTIARY VERDICT

Standard Copy-Paste Campaign

Simple coordinate wave submitted by a single bulk macro routine. Easily blocked by simple string hashes.

Class: Exact-duplicate

Evidentiary Blueprint: Template Mutation Highlights

Review the stacking of representative medoid template text against customized member edits. Notice how each member added custom sentences while preserving the core political template.

The representative template

“Paragraph 82 asks for input on whether throttling should be regulated. In the past ISPs have throttled content based on their own determination of what was lawful or permissible, and had to be forced to stop in the courts. Isn’t it possible they could do this again? I’m also concerned by mobile providers who say a plan is “unlimited,” but when you exceed the data cap, only throttle sites and services that aren’t part of their approved zero-rating network. Thanks for reading my comment.”

10428577327672/Apr 28, 2017/Nima Daivari/source: ecfs_text_data

Preview truncated to ~500 characters per the export contract. Full text remains in silver.parsed_comments.

Likely Campaign Origin

Not yet analyzed. Run the AttributionAgent to scan curated seed sources for evidence matches against this cluster's template text. Results are reported as candidate sources with confidence labels - never as definitive accusations.

python scripts/run_attribution.py --docket-id 17-108 --mode offline_seed --max-clusters 5

Language Migration Check

Not yet analyzed. Run the MigrationAgent against a local final rule text fixture to look for language overlap between this cluster and the rule. The agent reports phrase-level overlap; it does not claim causal influence.

python scripts/run_migration.py --docket-id 17-108 --mode local_text --final-rule-text evals/fixtures/migration/fcc_17_108_final_rule_excerpt.txt --max-clusters 5

All Campaign Cluster Members

10 other comments in this cluster

Members

Sort
  • Apr 28, 2017James Cameron

    “Paragraph 82 asks for input on whether throttling should be regulated. In the past ISPs have throttled content based on their own determination of what was lawful or permissible, and had to be forced to stop in the cour...”

    1042887235682

  • Apr 28, 2017jennifer pugh

    “Paragraph 82 asks for input on whether throttling should be regulated. ISPs have throttled content based on their own determination of what was lawful or permissible in the past, and had to be forced to stop in the cour...”

    1042892797599

  • Apr 28, 2017Chris Latko

    “Paragraph 82 asks for feedback on whether throttling should be regulated. In the past ISPs have throttled content. It is mostly based on their own determination of what was lawful or permissible, and had to be forced to...”

    10428091803977

  • Apr 28, 2017Kirk Johnson

    “I'm very concerned that this will cause protections in place to be weakened if we change the way they are enforced. In particular I'm concerned with paragraph 82 which asks for input on whether throttling should be regu...”

    10428145604276

  • Apr 28, 2017Lumumba

    “Paragraph 82 asks for input on whether throttling should be regulated. In the past ISPs have throttled content based on their own determination of what was lawful or permissible, and had to be forced to stop in the cour...”

    10428076975796

  • Apr 28, 2017Robert Toombs

    “The present notion of treating the internet like any other public-service utility seems exactly right. The internet is ubiquitous and essential, and companies should not be allowed to create premium-access levels that o...”

    1042859903077

  • Apr 28, 2017James G. Curione

    “Before you get to read my "Canned" comment below, I want to go on record to say that the only entities that will achieve "Internet Freedom" are the providers who rake us users over the coals as much as they can, with a...”

    10428007115053

  • Apr 28, 2017Spencer Elliott

    “I am extremely concerned and want to make it known that I am for net neutrality. Specifically paragraph 82 asks for input on whether throttling should be regulated. In the past ISPs have throttled content based on their...”

    10428475919018

  • Apr 28, 2017Hillel Bachrach

    “Paragraph 82 asks for input on whether throttling should be regulated. In the past ISPs have throttled content based on their own determination of what was lawful or permissible, and had to be forced to stop in the cour...”

    10428805500747

  • Apr 28, 2017Tobiah Coffman

    “Paragraph 82 asks for input on whether throttling should be regulated. In the past ISPs have throttled content based on their own determination of what was lawful or permissible, and had to be forced to stop in the cour...”

    1042867864351

Source / Live Databricks SQL mode/Embedding / databricks-bge-large-en/Similarity threshold / 0.92/Docket / 17-108